I’ve been following the Duke University experiment in providing iPods to all students. It’s pretty interesting and a marvel in the law of unintended consequences.
The evaluation report on Duke’s 2004/05 academic uses of iPods initiative is available and it’s free here.
It must have been a bit of a success since they’re continuing it in modified form next term. What I found most interesting was the surprising and innovative ways (though logical in hindsight) that professors and students found to use the devices. There were the usual shirty comments from lecturers that feared some students would not attend class and just listen to downloaded lectures while jogging. I have to say that if they’re providing so little interactivity or visuals in their lectures and so carefully avoid any socratic dialogue with the students, then how is a recording any worse or better than being there? As a lesson reviewing tool (even while exercising or multitasking), it seems pretty adequate.
But what I enjoyed was seeing the uses by music students to play recordings over and over to learn; to record their own work; and to share music in context of discussion. I liked the stories about language students repeating lectures to get all the nuances of the language, to get pronunciations right and to study. There are many stories like this about the power of these MP3 players in an academic context. There are even quite a few library uses! It’s a fairly concise report and worth the read.
I think that iPods are a bellwether technology. There are things to learn in this experiment that apply to all types of libraries. As we try to adapt our services to the wide range of multi-media technologies like MP3′s and streaming media, the services provided by such companies as iTunes, Overdrive and Audible.com, and even simple things like the streaming media author interviews in Sirsi’s enhanced OPAC feeds through DataStream. A few public libraries are offering audio-books on iPods to borrow and others are recording and podcasting teen and user book reviews. It’s a real renaissance right now where creativity is flowering. Pretty cool. Sure makes their library’s portals lively
Stephen
Please Take My Latest Survey
Are you a technophile or a technophobe?
Click here to take a quick 3-question survey.
Thank you!
Recent Comments
Categories
Archives
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005

While I’m generally somewhat of neo-Luddite/technorealist when it comes to new technology in the library, I think MP3 players can and will serve a useful purpose.
But I am a little surprised at how some of the big boosters for new technology in the library have a brand-name fetish for the iPod. You’d think there were no other media players out there.
One thing I find a little off-putting about the iPod is its marriage to iTunes and proprietary DRM. There are any number of flash memory players that can record and play generic MP3s. From a reliability standpoint, the hard drives and batteries in iPods are only good for a couple of years.
From my perspective, the iPods with hard drives are an unnecessarily expensive and delicate medium, and the DRM generates too many IP issues.
The smaller MP3 flash players are a more practical, economical alternative if you don’t have to have the latest Madison Ave. has to offer.
Nice to see another ILS vendor ‘get’ the corporate blogging opportunity – welcome.
http://www.talis.com/blogs