When I was a kid there was a bicycle rack outside the library. The library quietly made me feel welcome by providing a place to put my bike. As a young boy this was my ONLY mode of transportation. If I lost it or couldn’t lock it up safely, I risked having my entire life become smaller and my world become less fun, less exciting and just, well, smaller. The library and that bike rack were icons of my growing independence. I had my own bike. I had my own library card. It was somethng that I was proud of in that I was trusted at the library as an individual.
Recently I have been hearing too many stories about libraries thinking about (or actualy doing this) restricting skateboards. I hear from a few kids that some people who are working in libraries have been trying to create a flashpoint around libraries and skateboards. They’re either trying to ban their presence, or police kids in a very negative way or just create negative interactions with boys and girls wh skateboard. What’s the point of this?
What do libraries want? We want positive interactions with youth so that they do well in school, respect libraries and make them part of their lives, so that they eventually choose to vote for and support libraries as valid and valuable parts of the community. They’re the folks we need to engage long term.
So, what’s the point of having library staff encouraging negative teen patron interactions? Why don’t we have a skatebard rack inside the library? Why would we have our patrons risk their independence if their skateboard is lost or stolen? How wold they get to the library? We should support them. A skateboard box, Rubbermaid storage container or simply a towel bar by the service desk is a simple solution that provides a service instead of a negative interaction. It’s welcoming. Buy or get a second hand old skateboard and a few sticky letters that say WELCOME. Why wouldn’t we do this? It’s a cheap visible proof of welcoming attitudes.
We need to ask ourselves which of our policies really are not working for us and which one’s need to be made positive and friendly. Let’s make sure we don’t extend our authority control issues with information to authoritarian control foci with users. Not good.
Then let’s run our policies through a discussion with our teen advisors. Adventurous and visionary libraries know the value of this through experience.
I can see the change. In these Olympic weeks Skiiers have been joined by Snow Boarders. At home, Bicyclists have been joined by Skateboarders. Time to adapt to a new reality.
Stephen
Recent Comments
- Michelle Freeman on Library joy-spreader Mychal Threets is going to be the featured librarian in a new social media series for PBS Kids!
- Susan on ABRAM WHITE PAPER: TESTING AND EVALUATING CHATGPT: A PERSONAL HISTORY FROM RETRIEVAL TO TRANSFORMERS
- Stephen Abram on On LinkedIn librarians and Library Workers are present and it’s important.
- Rachel on July is Disability Pride Month!
- Rachel on On LinkedIn librarians and Library Workers are present and it’s important.
Categories
Archives
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
7 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.
You bring up an excellent question. We are in the final two months of preparing our next branch to open. While I was working in the building last Sunday I noticed about ten young teens using our parking lot for skateboarding. They were having a wonderful time. Obviously this presents issues that must be addressed once we open and have cars and people in the parking lot, but it also raises questions about teen-friendly libraries that are not so easy to answer. I am hoping that we will be able to walk a gentle middle road and become a welcoming place for those teens.
Amen! Let’s hope that the people in the pews and the people in the choir hear this message. (Gee…this sounds like spam, but it isn’t!)
BTW I’m doing a workshop on library outreach tomorrow. Will be interesting to see what people think of some of the examples I’m going to show.
Right on. At one library I know of, kids have to turn in their skateboards to the reference desk. I like the idea of a box or a shelf much better, though–it’s more like “here’s a place for your skateboard” and less like “you have to turn that in.”
This is great in theory. However, the problem is not simply the use of skateboards to get to the library. This in itself is fine, the kid carrying the board while in the library is fine.
The problem is property damage done to the library grounds when it is used as a skate park.
The problem is parents of young children and elderly patrons who avoid the library because they are scared to pass through the teens doing skate jumps off the front steps.
The problem is the liability of the library when said skater falls on his head and breaks his neck on library property.
Laura (et al) – how are those concerns any different from risks already incurred by enabling _people_ to use the library?
Liability, property damage, worried patrons are absolutely still issues even without skateboards.
So the question becomes, why is a single mode prohibited when it is the _behavior_ that is the problem?
Bsaxton… your point has little validation. Yes, liability, property damage, etc. are still issues. But, do me a favor and replace the skateboard with a firearm. Does the presence of a firearm mean someone will get hurt? No. Does it drastically increase the likelihood that someone will? I would say yes. And, so would the police that your taxes fund. And, so would the “head policeman” that your community, most likely, voted into office.
I’m not even going to get into the problems my library faces. I can, however, tell you that my little brother has had at least 10 skateboards in the past two years. His friends, likewise, have had numerous boards. Those boards don’t just magically break. They undergo insane amounts of stress. So do the skateboarders themselves. In two years, my brother and ALL his skateboarding friends have had serious injuries (broken bones, sprained joints, bruised ribs, concussions, etc). Any trial lawyer with bills to pay will jump at the chance to represent someone who has been skating in a certain place during business hours for an extended period of time who, finally, injures him-/herself.
Think I’m wrong? McDonald’s works with food. Roaches eat food. If you find a roach in your child’s Happy Meal… we’ve heard the ridiculous amounts awarded.
Correction: Andrew* Not Bsaxton… I erroneously associated bsaxton with the latest entry. Apologies…