I remain amazed that this isn’t reported more:
MPAA Admits Mistake on Downloading Study
By JUSTIN POPE, AP Education Writer
“Hollywood laid much of the blame for illegal movie downloading on college students. Now, it says its math was wrong.
In a 2005 study it commissioned, the Motion Picture Association of America claimed that 44 percent of the industry’s domestic losses came from illegal downloading of movies by college students, who often have access to high-bandwidth networks on campus.
The MPAA has used the study to pressure colleges to take tougher steps to prevent illegal file-sharing and to back legislation currently before the House of Representatives that would force them to do so.
But now the MPAA, which represents the U.S. motion picture industry, has told education groups a “human error” in that survey caused it to get the number wrong. It now blames college students for about 15 percent of revenue loss.”
More past the link.
They used this false study to justify their aims in lobbying the legal process.
Imagine asking for $1.5 million fines for each CD! They’re trying here.
If we don’t think fair use of articles is still at risk, I worry.
Now the blogophere is reporting that it is unlawful to lend books via Amazon’s kindle. Read more here , here and here.
I guess I won’t be buying a Kindle.
Anyway, the rubber is hitting the road on all of these rights issues in 2008. Be careful out there.
Stephen
Please Take My Latest Survey
Are you a technophile or a technophobe?
Click here to take a quick 3-question survey.
Thank you!
Recent Comments
- @cjanekruse on The Usable Library
- Diane K. Kovacs on Cloud Jargon Unwound: Distinguishing Saas, IaaS and PaaS [Infographic]
- Wei Neudorf on How Can I Survive a Job that Makes Me Use Outdated Technology?
- Bryce Rudder on How Can I Survive a Job that Makes Me Use Outdated Technology?
- Tony Bottrell on How Can I Survive a Job that Makes Me Use Outdated Technology?
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005

Hey Stephen–I amended the post to pose it as a question, as another librarian commented that her library got a completely different answer. I have a request for more information out to media relations at Amazon. Also, the two other links you provided point to my post. So, it’s really just me flappin’ my gums.