There’s some emerging consensus on how libraries might use Facebook. I am no expert but, as usual I have an opinion.
You have a choice. You can create a regular Facebook Page or a Facebook Group (sometimes called a Facebook Fan Page). Simple really. What would work best in which situation?
As other’s have noted (here and here), it can be very problematic if you use a page for your library institutional presence. (“Facebook ties a page to the account of the person who originally created it and I quote” and “the original creator of the Page may never be removed by other Page admins.” So, if your original creator leaves under a cloud your organization is at risk.)
Groups let you own your presence on an institutional level and allow the creator to be removed and assigned to others. For comparisons of pages and groups see this and this.
Of course the creation of a Facebook Group for your library does NOT absolve staff from having individual Facebook pages. Staff and management are individual experts and the key competitive advantage your library has against the generic search engines. If they’re not marketed well, and marketing themselves and building relationships with their key user groups then your library is just vanilla.
So, my opinion is that the library and it’s important segments have group pages and that librarians and key staff have their own pages. Try it.
Stephen
Please Take My Latest Survey
Are you a technophile or a technophobe?
Click here to take a quick 3-question survey.
Thank you!
Recent Comments
- Santosh Hulagabali on How to Handle Criticism in College and Beyond
- @nealedesignct on Trailer: Documentary Tackles the Future of Books
- @JeffieLibrarian on Trailer: Documentary Tackles the Future of Books
- Donna Feddern on Career Hierarchy: Paycheque to Adventures
- Marina Englesakis on Career Hierarchy: Paycheque to Adventures
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005

When my library was deciding whether to use a group or a page, we came down very firmly for the page: we saw it as more professional-looking, letting us have more control, and particularly as giving us far more options in terms of applications, events, etc. We didn’t look at the ‘creator’ issue but I’m not overly worried about it – of course I’m the one who created it and trust myself not to leave in a huff.