OK – this is what’s called a tipping point. Moving from most transactions being about communicatipon to one where most are about content is a shift. Now it’s doesn’t take a huge crystal ball to think that the next shift is about most interactions being social and context trumping the whole works as this stuff evolves.
Stephen
“Study: Primary role of the Internet shifting from communications to content
By Jacqui Cheng | Published: August 13, 2007 – 10:05PM CT
People are using time spent on the Internet to actually engage themselves in reading content more now than ever before, according to new data presented by the Online Publishers Association and Nielsen/NetRatings. The association released its four-year-long Internet Activity Index (IAI) today, which gauges people’s use of e-commerce, communications, content and search services over time. And while activities like e-commerce and communications still remain popular, reading and viewing content has skyrocketed between 2003 and today.
According to OPA, about 34 percent of Internet users’ time was spent reading content in 2003—at that time, content came in second to “communications,” which measured at 46 percent of Internet users’ time. However, as of May 2007, OPA reports that those numbers have practically reversed: content now commands 47 percent of Internet users’ time, and communications only 33 percent.
“The IAI has identified a very significant and sustained trend in where consumers are spending their online time,” OPA president Pam Horan said in a statement. “The index indicates that, over the last four years, the primary role of the Internet has shifted from communications to content.”
This dramatic shift in focus toward content is explained by the transition of offline activities—such as reading news, browsing TV or movie listings, and checking the weather—to online, according to Horan. “Quality content sites see a consistent pattern—major news drives traffic spikes, but traffic remains consistently higher even after the event. Major news events such as Hurricane Katrina and high-profile seasonal events such as the NCAA Final Four Basketball tournament are clearly driving consumers to engage more deeply with online content,” she said.
But online video and social networking sites also deserve some credit, says the report, for driving traffic and keeping users there in order to watch and communicate with each other. But wait, doesn’t social networking count as “communication?” Well, yes, but not under OPA’s metric, which appears to only categorize e-mail as “communication.” Instant messaging also counts as content, according to OPA, which could also help explain content’s explosive increase in popularity in recent years. “IM is a more efficient communications vehicle than e-mail,” reads the report. Thank you, Captain Obvious.
However, it seems that e-mail’s popularity isn’t actually going down, but rather the availability of content to consume is going up. Anecdotally, my colleagues and I agree that we conduct more of our everyday lives online than ever before, by getting driving directions, checking movie listings, reading reviews, news and blogs, and creating content of our own. So much so, that our ratio of content consumption to e-mail communications actually is skewed heavily in favor of content, even though we send more e-mail today than ever before too. As Internet access becomes more and more ubiquitous, we will likely continue to see this pattern in the years ahead as people continue to shift their offline activities online. Now, if there was only a way to wire up our brains to access WiFi… ”
More here and here and here.
Stephen
Recent Comments
- Michelle Freeman on Library joy-spreader Mychal Threets is going to be the featured librarian in a new social media series for PBS Kids!
- Susan on ABRAM WHITE PAPER: TESTING AND EVALUATING CHATGPT: A PERSONAL HISTORY FROM RETRIEVAL TO TRANSFORMERS
- Stephen Abram on On LinkedIn librarians and Library Workers are present and it’s important.
- Rachel on July is Disability Pride Month!
- Rachel on On LinkedIn librarians and Library Workers are present and it’s important.
Categories
Archives
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
One Response
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.
OK, I’ll admit that there is a bit of information in this somewhere. Not sure if it is communication or content, though.
Honestly, the only tipping point I see is the further proliferation of inane, made up categories and bad use of language.
Can someone please define “communication,” “content” and “social” (your next change)?
IM counts as content? I mean seriously!
The other issue is that all that content is there to communicate, and unless someone wrote the content to only communicate with themselves then all of it–content and communication–is social.
All communication–except that which goes on within one’s one head (and some won’t count that as communication)–is social. And there must be something that is being communicated. At least until someone chooses to define these concepts operationally, this is so.
Where will this inanity end?
Tipping point. Yep, we passed that a while ago.
Oh, and have no doubt that the Online Publishers Association is an unbiased source for this information. E.g., see how IM is classed.