To MOOC or not to MOOC: Infographic
http://topcollegesonline.org/mooc/
Source: TopCollegesOnline.org
MOOCs are hot, but is the sizzle about to fizzle?
A short history of distance learning:
1890s: Correspondence Courses
1920: 4 million people took correspondence courses
1993: Jones International University becomes first online U. [in the world]
2006: Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) coined in 2008 by Canadians Dave Cormier and Bryan Alexander
2012: The MOOC market explodes:
5 million: number of students enrolled in Coursera. 325 courses offered.
$63 million: total amount of investment funding in Coursera
1.6 million students in 200 countries enrolled in Udacity. 26 courses offered.
370,000: first year enrollment in edX. Offers 94 courses
$60 million: funding amount for edX, an MIT and Harvard project
Some new MOOCs: :
• San Francisco-based NovoEd is now offering courses directly from Stanford Business School.
• Berlin-based iversity is offering a wide range of courses from European educational institutions.
• Edraak, will be a MOOC portal for the Arab world
• In China – XuetangX
• France: Universite Numerique
Countries of origin: [where the MOOCs are coming from] :
• U.S.: 28%
• U.K. 11%
• India: 4.6%
• Brazil: 4.5%
• Canada: 4%
• Spain: 3.9%
• Australia: 3.5%
• Greece: 2.2 %
• Russia: 1.9%
• Germany: 1.8%
Why all the investment interest? :
• 2 billion potential learners around the world
• More than 70 percent of them cannot afford a college degree
• $400 billion: amount of money spent annually in U.S. on universities
• The $400 billion: more than the annual revenues of Amazon, Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft, and Twitter combined.
• 10 million: number of students who have taken at least one MOOC
FACT: mooc.org: Google is teaming up with EdX, to create mooc.org — a You Tube for MOOCs. It will be open to everyone, including businesses, governments, and private individuals.
BUT: 30% of employers believe a MOOC course represents a valid completion – Even so, that’s a major achievement.
To MOOC: :
• Most MOOCs are free or nearly free, a definite plus for the student.
• Provides a solution to overcrowding.
• Forces professors to improve lectures.
• Creates a dynamic archive.
• MOOCS are real college courses, complete with tests and grades.
• Brings people together from all over the world.
• Allows teachers to make the most of classroom time in blended classes. In a “flipped classroom,” teachers send students home with assignments to listen to or watch a recorded lecture
Or not to MOOC:
• It’s not about you, it’s about Money, Money, honey
• The motivation behind MOOCs is corporate profiteering.
• It’s part of a cost-cutting agenda to privatize public higher education
• MOOCs are the leading edge of the Wal-Martification of higher education.
• MOOCs create a two-tier education system.
• A “real” education for those who can afford to pay
• A bargain basement education for those able to only afford online options
• MOOCs are inferior
• they lack interpersonal exchange
• MOOCs are mechanistic
• education’s core values reducing to a mechanistic information-delivery process
• MOOCs are suffering from innovation exhaustion
• The sizzle will fizzle
• 93: failure rate percentage of students enrolled in MOOCs
• 150,000 to 1. Student to teacher ratio. Is that any way to learn? Grading papers is impossible.
That is the question.
Universities (paid) fight back:
Top 10 elite schools ALSO offer MOOCs
• Udemy: professors from universities like Dartmouth, the University of Virginia and Northwestern
• iTunes U: Apple’s free app “gives students access to all the materials for courses in a single place.
• Stanford:
• FACT: 160,000 students from 190 countries signed up to Stanford’s Introduction to AI” course, with 23,000 reportedly completing.
• UC Berkeley
• MIT
• Duke
• Harvard
• UCLA
• Open Yale
• Carnegie Mellon
And now there are
SPOCs: Small Private Online Courses :
• New B-to-B concept: license online courses to a university or an organization or corporation.
• Colorado State Global Campus, first to offer SPOCs
• SPOCs have 17-25 students
Sources:
http://www.educause.edu/ero/article/five-myths-about-moocs
http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2013/07/09/higher-ed-leaders-urge-slow-down-mooc-train
http://edf.stanford.edu/readings/mooc-marketplace-takes
http://www.edtechmagazine.com/higher/article/2013/02/11-enlightening-statistics-about-massive-open-online-courses
http://adulted.about.com/od/Adult-Education-in-the-U.S./a/The-Pros-And-Cons-Of-Moocs.htm
Stephen
25 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.
Continuing the Discussion
Jacqui Liepshutz liked this on Facebook.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YPJalOpTWZM
This is U of T prof Jeff Rosenthal, with the REAL story of MOOCs!
Marina Englesakis liked this on Facebook.
Julie Carmen liked this on Facebook.
RT @sabram: To MOOC or not to MOOC: Infographic:
http://t.co/nCTIfKZqN7
To MOOC or not to MOOC … interesting stats, 93% failure rate, have just signed up for my first MOOC in February! http://t.co/fnydzqDM50
New To MOOC or not to MOOC: Infographic – Stephen’s Lighthouse – http://t.co/cMptFY3npY
Great infographic .. very thought provoking … As a professional who is focused on virtual teams, virtual classrooms and blended learning, I have developed a simple possible scenario that is playing out in moving to the future of education. I think that accreditation is moving to become disassociated with how you learn what you need to know. I think that the professional designations such as Project Manager Professional (www.pmi.org) and Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer are bell weathers of the new era. In future, it will not matter how or where you learned what you need to know to become recognized as having the knowledge and expertise in a discipline. Instead, you will only need to pay to take examinations to demonstrate that you do. MOOCS are only one of the brave new adventures in this wild new world of virtual education. One of the new businesses popping up are those who for a fee will administer in person examinations at a large number of physical sites in response to this trend. Forward thinking universities are struggling to understand this shift.
RT @sabram: To MOOC or not to MOOC: Infographic:
http://t.co/nCTIfKZqN7
To MOOC or not to MOOC: Infographic http://t.co/XAcgEWnA0J
Roxann Riskin liked this on Facebook.
RT @louberee: New To MOOC or not to MOOC: Infographic – Stephen’s Lighthouse – http://t.co/cMptFY3npY
Amra Porobic liked this on Facebook.
RT @sabram: To MOOC or not to MOOC: Infographic:
http://t.co/nCTIfKZqN7
RT @sabram: To MOOC or not to MOOC: Infographic:
http://t.co/nCTIfKZqN7
To #MOOC or not to MOOC: Excellent #Infographic explains all. – via Stephen’s Lighthouse http://t.co/DKzi5Hb7Cl #library #lis #education
RT @CarlowLibraries: To #MOOC or not to MOOC: Excellent #Infographic explains all. – via Stephen’s Lighthouse http://t.co/DKzi5Hb7Cl #libra…
RT @sabram: To MOOC or not to MOOC: Infographic:
http://t.co/nCTIfKZqN7
To MOOC or not to MOOC: great Infographic by Stephen Abram. And the academic library? Is it part of this ecosystem? http://t.co/28GKHVz9tT
RT @schopfel: To MOOC or not to MOOC: great Infographic by Stephen Abram. And the academic library? Is it part of this ecosystem? http://t.…
RT @schopfel: To MOOC or not to MOOC: great Infographic by Stephen Abram. And the academic library? Is it part of this ecosystem? http://t.…
RT @schopfel: To MOOC or not to MOOC: great Infographic by Stephen Abram. And the academic library? Is it part of this ecosystem? http://t.…
RT @schopfel: To MOOC or not to MOOC: great Infographic by Stephen Abram. And the academic library? Is it part of this ecosystem? http://t.…
RT @schopfel: To MOOC or not to MOOC: great Infographic by Stephen Abram. And the academic library? Is it part of this ecosystem? http://t.…