Why do management researchers disagree on what really drives organizational outcomes and how can understanding these “causal mechanisms” bring clarity?
“What Are Mechanisms? Ways of Conceptualizing and Studying Causal Mechanisms”
https://lnkd.in/eeaVtmkC by Joep Cornelissen and Mirjam Werner in Organizational Research Methods (Sage)
This paper reviews how management research has studied causal mechanisms. It highlights three main perspectives—contextual, constitutive, and interventionist—explaining their assumptions, methodological choices, challenges, and offering guidance for future research.
Abstract
Over the last two decades, much of management research has converged on the belief that one of its major aims is to identify the causal mechanisms that produce the phenomena that researchers seek to explain. In this paper, we review and synthesize the literature that has amassed around causal mechanisms. We do so by detailing the different methodological perspectives that are featured in management research, which we label as the contextual, constitutive, and interventionist perspectives. For each of these perspectives, we examine what it theoretically presupposes a mechanism to be, how this connects to methodological choices, and how this shapes the kind of mechanism-based explanations that each perspective offers. We also explore the main inferential challenges for each of these perspectives and offer specific methodological guidance in response. In this way, we aim to offer a common plank for theorizing and research on causal mechanisms in ways that recognize and harness the productive differences across different epistemologies and methodological traditions.
0 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.