Well I am off today to the Collaborative Virtual Reference Symposium in Denver. I love the explorations we’re doing with VR. I am very interested in the work of our company Sirsi Docutek as well as others in the industry like OCLC’s Questionpoint and Tutor.com. Even the entry level stuff like instant messenger services in libraries and JYBE and Skype.
I like to consider the big picture – the really big picture. These technologies are not just about serving up our reference services virtually. They’re about putting the librarian back into the virtual space! Think about it. We are rapidly moving to the time (if some libraries are not already there) where the vast majority of our interactions with our users will be virtual – website hits, patron driven ILL, remote database searching and on and on. Loads of this happens with very little (or no) interaction with the humans in the library – librarians, information professionals and library workers – that improve the service. While our virtual services deliver information quickly, they don’t improve the quality of the question which has been reference librarians’ stock in trade for more than a century. If we want to improve, remain and stay relevant, we have to discover the virtual reference modalities that work. That requires a lot of experimentation, sharing and cooperation. It’s an exciting field right now as technology moves into the user space more and more.
Stephen
Please Take My Latest Survey
Are you a technophile or a technophobe?
Click here to take a quick 3-question survey.
Thank you!
Recent Comments
- Wei Neudorf on Cloud Jargon Unwound: Distinguishing Saas, IaaS and PaaS [Infographic]
- Wei Neudorf on State Universities Should Move Online More Agreessively: Report Argues
- Wei Neudorf on Student Needs and Expectations: A CLOSER LOOK AT THE RESEARCH
- Wei Neudorf on Perfect Gifts for Teacher-Librarians (Or Things You Would Buy for Yourself)
- @LibrarianVoices on New BookStats Report Uses Questionable Data to Show Spectacular Growth of eBook Market Since 2008
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005

Stephen, congratulations on the fine new blog and thanks for this great post to get things rolling! Since I’m not seeing a way to do trackback on this blog yet, I’ll mention that I commented on your ideas above over at the lbr weblog, at…
http://lbr.library-blogs.net/stephens_lighthouse.htm
Thanks again and kudos!
I like this article. I am concerned about the special library portion. The research on special libraries, although compelling, dates back to the mid-’90′s. I wish some organization could sponsor something more recent.