I was reviewing Sirsi’s Reading Rooms (Specialized Rooms that are part of our Enterprise Portal Solution -EPS for short – that help folks select books to read by genre) the other day and it made me remember the Reader’s Bill of Rights create by Daniel Pennac. If you don’t know them, here they are:
The Reader’s Bill of Rights
1. The right not to read.
2. The right to skip pages.
3. The right to not finish.
4. The right to reread.
5. The right to read anything.
6. The right to escapism.
7. The right to read anywhere.
8. The right to browse.
9. The right to read out loud.
10.The right to not defend your tastes.
Some people find these controversial. Amazing! It doesn’t include my favourite – the right to highlight, dog ear and annotate your own books.
I find these principles a nice adjunct to Ranganathan’s Five Laws of Library
1. Books are for use.
2. Every reader his or her book.
3. Every book its reader.
4. Save the time of the reader.
5. The Library is a growing organism.
It’s a good idea that we remind ourselves of these basic principles of library service. We build user focused services. We build user focused websites. Some, but not all of our users are readers. I find Walt Crawford’s and Michael Gorman’s 5 additional or updated laws useful too:
1. Libraries serve humanity.
2. Respect all forms by which knowledge is communicated.
3. Use technology intelligently to enhance service.
4. Protect free access to knowledge.
5. Honor the past and create the future.
A French paper, by Alireza Noruzi poses the question, “Does the web save the time of the user?” and adds this little list:
1. Web resources are for use.
2. Every user his or her web resource.
3. Every web resource its user.
4. Save the time of the user.
5. The Web is a growing organism.
Sounds familiar. Now we just need to noodle long and had on the essential goal – making our new and revamped virtual services align with our basic service mandates to serve the user and reader. Ask ourselves the hadr question – are the needs of users and readers the same? It’s not an easy question. We’re not anywhere near done yet. It will be a great and exciting journey. As we continue to let a thousand flowers bloom, we will find just the right ones to discover the library of the future.
Stephen
Please Take My Latest Survey
Are you a technophile or a technophobe?
Click here to take a quick 3-question survey.
Thank you!
Recent Comments
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005

Stephen, we met at the CO Collaborative VR conference. I have a half funny, but more than half truthful added/amended set of rules. These are based on years of delivering all kinds of internet training to librarians and patrons, combined with that grounding in Ranganathan et al while in Library School and the reality of the online search world.
1) Patrons just want stuff
2) Give it to them
3) Now
Later,
Mark
As are many libraries, the one where I work is part of a major institution. I became aware that we spend so much time advocating for our patrons, but what about the librarians?
1. Our email is restricted even censored (what library would actually read patrons emails?);
2. We have no freedom of speech regarding work issues, corporate issues, or institutional issues;
3. The sharing of ideas is dangerous, it is a case of cya, watch your back, and document, document document.
I think it is quite ironic, and shocking, and probably nothing can be done about it.