Everyone who knows me knows that I am an admirer of David Snowden. He formerly ran the IBM Institute for Knowledge Management and now leads the Cynefin Centre.
To be able to quote David is to feel smart in that way you do when you actually ‘get’ the arcane reference to the lesser works of Shakespeare over dinner with professorial friends. His knowledge is broad and deep.
Anyway, cynefin is one of those words like simpatico in Italian that just doesn’t translate well into English, so broadly, quoting Dave, the word “‘Cynefin’ is a Welsh word whose literal translation into English as habitat or place fails to do it justice. It is more properly understood as the place of our multiple belongings; the sense that we all, individually and collectively, have many roots: cultural, religious, geographic, tribal etc. We can never be fully aware of the nature of those belongings, but they profoundly influence what we are. The name seeks to remind us that all human interactions are strongly influenced and frequently determined by the patterns of our multiple experiences, both through the direct influence of personal experience and through collective experience expressed as stories.”
His thinking about stories and social networks and the ties that bind us together and with our history can do a lot to inform our thinking on libraries. Libraries are fundamentally and foundationally based in communities – neighourhoods, research communities, learning communities, workplaces and cultural communities. (I love communities as the glue that binds strategy together as you can see here.) By reading Dave’s stuff or just listening to him, we learn a lot about the connections that make libraries great. It’s more than libraries being just the storehouses of our culture’s stories and narratives. It’s about the subtle role we play in making connections within our communities but also with our past knowledge. Libraries can be great places to find more cynefin – those places from which all our knowledge comes – our education, or experiences, our learning, our families, our culture, what we read, hear or see, our religion or faith, and on and on.
Dave’s speeches to the library community have been great. I’ve had him keynote both the Ontario (2002) and Canadian Library Association (2005) conferences to huge acclaim and he regularly does Information Today’s various KM World, Internet Librarian and Computers in Libraries conferences.
Anyway, I am eagerly awaiting Snowden’s book which he hopes to publish ths year. He has a number of articles on his website here. SirsiDynix is working with a number of the Cynefin Centre’s team to collect library user and librarian narrative stories using the Cynefin Process. Already we have attained huge insights into the deeper reasons people use libraries and what they are ‘really’ trying to achieve. It’s truly fascinating. I’ll be sharing these over the coming year at various conferences. articles and especially the SirsiDynix SuperConference.
Stephen
Please Take My Latest Survey
Are you a technophile or a technophobe?
Click here to take a quick 3-question survey.
Thank you!
Recent Comments
- Wei Neudorf on Future of Libraries – Preview
- Wei Neudorf on Friday Fun: Vintage Librarian Photos
- Wei Neudorf on 50 Scientifically Proven Ways to Be More Persuasive
- Wei Neudorf on Friday Fun: Dominoes and Internet Perfection
- Wei Neudorf on UK Organization Publishes Research Into Public Library of the Future
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005

I’m so glad to hear someone talking about this – especially the VP Innovation for the largest maker of IL systems! It gives me hope for the future!
Anyway, during my MLS, I did a major project on information architecture and “humanity.” I was hoping to extrapolate into the digital realm some of Christopher Alexander’s ideas about architecture, urban design, and human beings. My question was, “how can we create online knowledge environments that ‘live’?: environments that foster community and reinforce our ‘humanness’ in all its wonderful complexity.” And I think the key lies in complexity: complex, interlaced systems free us from the tyranny of heirarchies and binary oppositions. Library classification systems and catalogues are, of course, founded on heirarchies of differentiation, while emerging web technologies are the organic product of an apparently chaotic system of interconnectivity that people somehow find much more comfortable than the librarian’s carefully constructed bibliographic universe. I think, when we dig down far enough, we’ll discover that to maintain a distinction between “knowledge” and “community” is at best unhelpful; at worst: destructive.
At any rate, if you haven’t yet had a chance, check out Christopher Alexander’s “A Pattern Language: Towns, Buildings, Construction,” (OUP, 1977) and try to envision “the knowledgesphere” built on such terms.
Thanks for your inspiring and eminently readable posts!