Special Librarians take note:
2008: Year of Information Overload?
“Interruptions aren’t merely annoying; they’re also bad for productivity. And when you multiply the interruptions made possible by email, phone calls, text messages, and Twitters across the entire US, the result is lost productivity on a massive scale: $650 billion in a single year.
That’s according to research firm Basex, which chose “information overload” as its 2008 “Problem of the Year.” Failure to solve the problem will lead to “reduced productivity and throttled innovation.” The situation is dire enough that Intel’s Nathan Zeldes estimates “the impact of information overload on each knowledge worker at up to eight hours a week.” ”
Well, there now. There’s a nice Christmas / New Year’s gift.
Sounds like these companies need librarians! This isn’t the first of these studies that show the massive impact on productivity for knowledge workers of poor information strategies. If we are truly entering a knowledge-based economy (and I believe we have), we better speak up more clearly on the roles the variety of information professionals and librarians play in assuring success. Perhaps we should target investors, venture and equity capitalists? Don’t invest in firms that have horrible information practices and lack professional staff and software to manage knowledge assets.
Hmmmm.
Stephen
Please Take My Latest Survey
Are you a technophile or a technophobe?
Click here to take a quick 3-question survey.
Thank you!
Recent Comments
- Effie Patelos on Men Are From Google+ And LinkedIn, Women Are From Twitter And Pinterest [INFOGRAPHIC]
- @infohio on Men Are From Google+ And LinkedIn, Women Are From Twitter And Pinterest [INFOGRAPHIC]
- Bobbi L. Newman on Who Needs a Librarian When You Have Google?
- Cindy Seger on Who Needs a Librarian When You Have Google?
- Effie Patelos on Who Needs a Librarian When You Have Google?
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005

Stephen, you are right to a great extent. Companies need knowledge professionals, such as librarians among others, who can help manage the flood of information. But that is only part of the solution – albeit an important part.