The latest Trendwatching Report is all about free. It’s titled “Free Love” in a tongue in cheek kind of way.
Here’s their definition:
“FREE LOVE: the ongoing rise of free, valuable stuff that’s available to consumers online and offline. From AirAsia tickets to Wikipedia, and from diapers to music.
FREE LOVE thrives on an all-out war for consumers’ ever-scarcer attention and the resulting new business models and marketing techniques, but also benefits from the ever-decreasing costs of producing physical goods, the post-scarcity dynamics of the online world (and the related avalanche of free content created by attention-hungry members of GENERATION C), the many C2C marketplaces enabling consumers to swap instead of spend, and an emerging recycling culture.
Expect FREE LOVE to become an integral if not essential part of doing business.”
Go and read the report and think about these questions:
1. Most libraries are free to the end user. In fact most libraries have mostly been free for centuries, at least in the western world. So what is it about free in the library sense that matters to our users?
2. If libraries are free and known to be free by our users, why are do we remain challenged by the cult of free on the Internet?
3. Do libraries place barriers to success for ourselves and end users? Are we doing things that don’t work for us anymore? What does your library do that might be an unjustifiable barrier?
For example:
a) Do we use fines as punishments? Can we find good examples of fines and punishments on free websites?
b) Do we require people to come to the elibrary, be interviewed and show ID to use us for our free services like database searching on the web? Are there examples of successful websites that do this or have trhey developed more seamless mechanisms?
c) Do we have line-ups? Is there a metaphor for physical line-ups on the free services? Are online holds just another form of line-up?
d) Is our ‘location’ too physical in the user’s head? Do any of the free virtual services have a ‘place’ that is physical that matters to the user?
4. Are there new ways to liberate our ‘free’ to compete with the other free?
If you don’t know the story about “Information Wants to be Free” read by old article here. How do we get the people side of libraries promoted and unfetter our relationships?
Just thinking out loud. But if free was so all important then libraries have a great advantage. Clearly, there’s more at play here and the Trendwatching Briefing is a nice think piece.
Stephen
Please Take My Latest Survey
Are you a technophile or a technophobe?
Click here to take a quick 3-question survey.
Thank you!
Recent Comments
- @parallaxinfo on Career Hierarchy: Paycheque to Adventures
- @elainedomsy on How to Handle Criticism in College and Beyond
- @CalebDomsy on How to Handle Criticism in College and Beyond
- Santosh Hulagabali on How to Handle Criticism in College and Beyond
- @nealedesignct on Trailer: Documentary Tackles the Future of Books
Categories
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005

Great food for thought – I read the latest Wired cover story today, which is on a similar topic (http://www.wired.com/techbiz/it/magazine/16-03/ff_free), and puzzled about how libraries fit into the “free-conomics” equation.
Hello Stephen,
I could never figure out why libraries like to punish people for enjoying a book too long. I have long thought this practice is “old fashioned”. When I was the Librarian at a high school we never had fines. Yes, the student had to pay if the book was lost or damaged. The borrow does have some onus of responsibility. However I felt the fines just kept out users or potential users. I have been advocating in my board that we abolish library fines altogether. I have come across nothing but static and resistance. I found your thoughts on this issue very enlightening when I heard you speak about it albeit briefly, on Monday in Stratford. Is it possible for you to email me some of your thoughts or stats on library fines. I would very mush appreciate it.
I never will understand why we, Library professionals, try so hard to keep people away?
Cheers
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Sure:
stephen.abram (at) gmail.com