Have you caught the latest issue of Scientific American? Thought you’d be interested in this:
The Rich See a Different Internet Than the Poor
Ninety-nine percent of us live on the wrong side of a one-way mirror
http://www.scientificamerican.
“Imagine an Internet where unseen hands curate your entire experience. Where third parties predetermine the news, products and prices you see—even the people you meet. A world where you think you are making choices, but in reality, your options are narrowed and refined until you are left with merely the illusion of control. This is not far from what is happening today.
Thanks to technology that enables Google, Facebook and others to gather information about us and use it to tailor the others to gather information about us and use it to tailor the user experience to our own personal tastes, habits and income, the Internet has become a different place for the rich and for the poor. Most of us have become unwitting actors in an unfolding drama about the tale of two Internets. There is yours and mine, theirs and ours.
Here’s how it works. Advertising currently drives the vast majority of the Internet industry by volume of revenue. Silicon Valley is excellent at founding and funding companies that give you free apps and then collect and sell your data when you use them. For most of the Internet’s short history, the primary goal of this data collection was classic product marketing: for example, advertisers might want to show me Nikes and my wife Manolo Blahniks. But increasingly, data collection is leapfrogging well beyond strict advertising and enabling insurance, medical and other companies to benefit from analyzing your personal, highly detailed “Big Data” record without your knowledge. Based on this analysis, these companies then make decisions about you—including whether you are even worth marketing to at all.
As a result, 99 percent of us live on the wrong side of a one-way mirror, in which the other 1 percent manipulates our experiences. Some laud this trend as “personalization”—which sounds innocuous and fun, evoking the notion that the ads we see might appear in our favorite color schemes. What we are talking about, however, is much deeper and significantly more consequential.”
Hmmmm. Media and information fluency skills ARE important.
Stephen

14 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.
The ones that try to reduce content spam more are DuckDuckGo and Blekko.
Stephen
Continuing the Discussion
RT @sabram: The Rich See a Different Internet Than the Poor: Scientific American… http://t.co/258CZP7E
RT @sabram: The Rich See a Different Internet Than the Poor: Scientific American… http://t.co/258CZP7E
Emily Clasper liked this on Facebook.
RT @sabram: The Rich See a Different Internet Than the Poor: Scientific American… http://t.co/258CZP7E
RT @sabram: The Rich See a Different Internet Than the Poor: Scientific American… http://t.co/258CZP7E
RT @sabram: The Rich See a Different Internet Than the Poor: Scientific American… http://t.co/258CZP7E
RT @sabram: The Rich See a Different Internet Than the Poor: Scientific American… http://t.co/258CZP7E
RT @sabram: The Rich See a Different Internet Than the Poor: Scientific American… http://t.co/258CZP7E
RT @sabram: The Rich See a Different Internet Than the Poor: Scientific American… http://t.co/258CZP7E
I’d agree, except that those who comprise the economic 1% are probably even less able to suss out how the Internet works than those in the 99% who pay attention to such things.
Why can’t Internet be free for all??
How does that explain the Asian girls I’m asked to connect with on Facebook? do they know about my sushi addiction?
Tell us again what search portals to use to avoid this type of bias