Ken Haycock, Dean of San Jose State University SLIS, commented in his keynote at the Jan. 2007 SLA Leadership Summit that librarians risk wallowing in a culture of victimization and risk aversion. By pointing to a potential problem he allowed us to discuss it and work to avoid the downside of black hat negative thinking.
I was reminded of this by a recent post called “People Who Become Wealthy Think Differently” by Dr. Lauchlan A. K. Mackinnon discusses the book Secrets of the Millionaire Mind by T. Harv Eker who argues that people who become wealthy think differently in 17 specific ways:
Rich people believe: “I create my life.” Poor people believe: “Life happens to me.”
Rich people play the money game to win. Poor people play the money game to not lose.
Rich people are committed to being rich. Poor people want to be rich.
Rich people think big. Poor people think small.
Rich people focus on opportunities. Poor people focus on obstacles.
Rich people admire other rich and successful people. Poor people resent rich and successful people.
Rich people associate with positive, successful people. Poor people associate with negative or unsuccessful people.
Rich people are willing to promote themselves and their value. Poor people think negatively about selling and promotion.
Rich people are bigger than their problems. Poor people are smaller than their problems.
Rich people are excellent receivers. Poor people are poor receivers.
Rich people choose to get paid based on results. Poor people choose to get paid based on time.
Rich people think “both”. Poor people think “either/or”.
Rich people focus on their net worth. Poor people focus on their working income.
Rich people manage their money well. Poor people mismanage their money well.
Rich people have their money work hard for them. Poor people work hard for their money.
Rich people act in spite of fear. Poor people let fear stop them.
Rich people constantly learn and grow. Poor people think they already know.
Try re-reading the list and substitute the following for rich people/poor people:
Leaders and effective followers, Daily Workers
Innovative librarians, conservative librarians
Librarian 2.0, Librarian 1.0
Positive folks, Cautious folks
Open thinkers, Risk-averse thinkers
Bloggers and sharers, non-contributors
Continuous Learners, ‘Done” people
Sometimes reasons are excuses, poverty is a state of mind and inertia and fear are more powerful in our minds than reality. (yes, and sometimes not – although a positive attitude seems to trump everything.)
I know this might annoy a few folks – especially my bravely anonymous critics. It’s meant to be a discussion launch point not a criticism. There are tons of innovative librarians, libraries and people in our world. Are we supportive enough of them? Are we focusing on future success or potential failure?
I’m just saying….
Stephen
Recent Comments
- Stephen Abram on FREE SJSU iSchool Webinar: “Deaf Community and Culture and Best Practices for Libraries”
- Darlene Chalker on FREE SJSU iSchool Webinar: “Deaf Community and Culture and Best Practices for Libraries”
- Stephen Abram on World Reading Habits in 2021 [Infographic]
- David Whatson on World Reading Habits in 2021 [Infographic]
- Jill Hurst-Wahl on Excuses, Reasons, and The 5 Why’s
Categories
Archives
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
2 Responses
Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.
Some thoughts are better left unspoken; pondered certainly. At any given time, I may be “us” or “them”. That’s not necessarily a bad thing. It all depends on the definition of Rich and Poor.
Great post, Stephen, thanks. “Secrets of the Millionaire Mind” seems very similar in tone to “Rich Dad, Poor Dad” and, dare I say it, “The Secret” 🙂 I’ve had people on both sides of the spectrum in my professional and personal lives, and I find myself choosing the “rich people”/innovative/open side of the spectrum more consciously. Frankly, it’s amazing how much more fulfilling, exciting and rewarding life can be simply coming from a different perspective. Once you start practicing it, the fear which drives the negative perspective really starts to drop away.
Scott