In the battle between Google Maps and MapQuest, which one do you use?
Do you one for personal directions and another for your library website? I used to use MapQuest but now use Google Maps mostly. I still find some weird directions but that happens with Silicon Sally on the car GPS’s too, not that I’m the one driving.
I suspect Google Maps is used more for library websites due to it’s easy API that allows for easier integration. I can’t imagine a good library website without a proper map and directions for walking or driving to every branch. It’s so easy and, really, what good is just a simple address unless you’ve lived in town for years?
And besides, the Google Earth and satellite views are just plain fun.
Add this to a good SEO plan where you find the library – in addition to the local bookstores – when you search on books in Google and you’re golden.
Stephen
Recent Comments
- Angela Benford on YouTube’s new documentary demystifying artificial intelligence features Robert Downey Jr. and an AI baby
- Barbi Gardiner on New Resource: Library Tech Talk
- ramblerr on Stop Trusting Viral Videos
- Angela on VIDEO: Hidden Details of the New York Public Library | Architectural Digest
- Doug Johnson on The School Librarian: Your Ultimate Digital Resource
Categories
Archives
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
Greetings!
the next year budget for CISTI will be 30% of the existing budget.
300 of us will possibly lose their jobs.
The message is: our existing government does not believe in science.
The Canadian government cannot maintain the unique national library of science, technology and medicine?
This is a huge mistake and will make a disastrous impact on Canadians in the future.
What will be the impact?
– If scientific, medical and technical information is made difficult to access for Canadian researchers, performance of the Canadian researchers will decline.
– If their performance decline, the funding will be cut.
– If funding is cut, researchers mill emigrate to the United States or other countries where funding for science is available
– Canada will be further behind as a country in the global market for research and innovation.
– Our Canadian standard of living will decline
– The following socio economic issues will not be addressed: aging population which is taxing our health system with chronic diseases, deterioration of the environment to a point of non-return and a huge increase in energy consumption,
– etc…………
Where did the NRC strategic plan go?
Science technology and communication was identified in the NRC strategic plan as key sector that National Research Council should focus on
CISTI is Science technology and communication.
Here is a summary of the NRC stratefic plan:
http:
//www.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/aboutUs/corporatereports/pdf/NRC_strategy_2011_e.pdf
Good article:
– http://www.cmaj.ca/cgi/rapidpdf/cmaj.090209
Any idea on how to protest this decision is welcome.
What a shame.
I am in grief right now.
Regards,,
Diane-Hélène Caouette
_______________________________________________________
Diane-Hélène Caouette
613-990-1176
diane-helene.caouette@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
CISTI
National Research Council, Building M-55
1200 Montreal Road
Ottawa, ON K1A 0S2
Government of Canada
613-990-1176
diane-helene.caouette@nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
ICIST
Conseil National de Recherches Canada
1200 rue Montréal
Ottawa, ON K1A 0S2
Gouvernement du Canada