Skip to content


Who Owns the Knowledge? Copyright, GenAI, and the Future of Academic Publishing

Who Owns the Knowledge? Copyright, GenAI, and the Future of Academic Publishing

https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.21755

The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and large language models (LLMs) into scientific research and higher education presents a paradigm shift, offering revolutionizing opportunities while simultaneously raising profound ethical, legal, and regulatory questions. This study examines the complex intersection of AI and science, with a specific focus on the challenges posed to copyright law and the principles of open science. The author argues that current regulatory frameworks in key jurisdictions like the United States, China, the European Union, and the United Kingdom, while aiming to foster innovation, contain significant gaps, particularly concerning the use of copyrighted works and open science outputs for AI training. Widely adopted licensing mechanisms, such as Creative Commons, fail to adequately address the nuances of AI training, and the pervasive lack of attribution within AI systems fundamentally challenges established notions of originality. While current doctrine treats AI training as potentially fair use, this paper argues such mechanisms are inadequate and that copyright holders should retain explicit opt-out rights regardless of fair use doctrine. Instead, the author advocates for upholding authors’ rights to refuse the use of their works for AI training and proposes that universities assume a leading role in shaping responsible AI governance. The conclusion is that a harmonized international legislative effort is urgently needed to ensure transparency, protect intellectual property, and prevent the emergence of an oligopolistic market structure that could prioritize commercial profit over scientific integrity and equitable knowledge production. This is a substantially expanded and revised version of a work originally presented at the 20th International Conference on Scientometrics & Informetrics (Kochetkov, 2025).

Comments: The second version version substantially revises the original preprint through expanded legal analysis, representation of the new technical standard (RSL 1.0), and removing substantial material lacking direct relevance to copyright and AI training
Subjects: Digital Libraries (cs.DL); Artificial Intelligence (cs.AI); Computers and Society (cs.CY)
ACM classes: A.0
Cite as: arXiv:2511.21755 [cs.DL]
(or arXiv:2511.21755v2 [cs.DL] for this version)
https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2511.21755

  • Pro plugin deactivated or invalid

Posted on: February 14, 2026, 6:52 am Category: Uncategorized

0 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.